Authorities in Newburgh revealed the primary grim particulars investigators discovered following an 8-month investigation into the demise a 7-year-old in February 2021.
Peter Cuacuas was introduced “lifeless” and weighing solely 37 kilos to Montefiore St. Luke’s Cornwall Hospital in Newburgh again on Feb. 10 by his father’s girlfriend, Letitia Bravo, police mentioned Friday. The health worker in Orange County discovered Cuacuas died of hunger.
An investigation launched shortly after, who’s particulars had been saved below wraps till now, revealed Bravo had turn out to be the boy’s main caretaker in the someday after the beginning of college in Sept. 2020, in line with police. The 39-year-old, who’s charged with second-degree homicide, allegedly watched after Cuacuas six days per week and saved him locked in a bed room since January.
“It is alleged that Bravo kept Peter locked and secreted in a bedroom behind a door that locked from the outside. Since January of 2021, Peter never logged on for virtual schooling, despite numerous conversations between Bravo and Peter’s teachers and other school representatives,” a launch from the investigators mentioned.
At the very least someday every week it is believed that the boy’s father, Arturo Cuacuas, had custody or was visiting together with his son. As advised by the police and prosecutor, Bravo was liable for the 7-year-old’s deteriorating situation however his father didn’t appropriately intervene.
“[Arturo Cuacuas] knew or should have known the condition was worsening and should have taken action to do something about it,” Orange County District Legal professional David Hoovler mentioned at a press convention Friday.
Hoovler took a couple of minutes in the press convention to defend the size of the investigation, saying that COVID obstacles and staffing shortages added to the already laborious time of conducting interviews, operating DNA and different features of a demise investigation.
Bravo is scheduled again in courtroom on Oct. 26. Legal professional info for both defendant was not instantly identified.