Site icon Kozweek

James Dolan Threatens to Ban Alcohol During Upcoming Rangers Game at Madison Square Garden – NBC New York

James Dolan Threatens to Ban Alcohol During Upcoming Rangers Game at Madison Square Garden – NBC New York

What to Know

  • Madison Square Garden proprietor James Dolan threatened to ban the sale of alcohol at an upcoming New York Rangers sport
  • Dolan’s remarks got here after New York Legal professional Normal Letitia James pressed MSG Leisure about its obvious use of facial recognition expertise to determine opposing legal professionals
  • What began the controversy was a mom becoming a member of her daughter on a Woman Scout journey to Radio Metropolis Music Corridor, however not being allowed to enter as a result of the regulation agency she works for is suing MSG Leisure — regardless that she isn’t an lawyer engaged on any circumstances involving the corporate

Yea, this may actually persuade individuals to be in your aspect. Particularly hockey followers.

Madison Square Garden proprietor James Dolan threatened to ban the sale of alcohol at an upcoming New York Rangers sport.

It is someway related to an ongoing battle about his firm’s use of facial recognition expertise.

Dolan made the risk throughout a TV interview Thursday morning.

“The SLA [State Liquor Authority] is manner, manner past their skis…they’re being extraordinarily aggressive and so they’re saying ‘We’re going to take away your liquor license.’ So I’ve slightly shock for them,” Dolan said during the interview. “What we’re gonna do, proper, it we’re going to choose an evening, perhaps a Rangers sport, and we’re gonna shut down all of the liquor and alcohol within the constructing.”

The warning is available in response to the State Liquor Authority investigating Dolan’s use of facial recognition expertise, which has resulted in bans in opposition to a gaggle of legal professionals who’re at the moment suing his firm, MSG Leisure Company.

“It’s like something out of ‘The Godfather,’ it’s like ‘It’s only business.’ It’s not only business, and if you sue us, we’re gonna tell you not to come,” Dolan continued. “If you’re grandstanding with the press, et cetera, I’m gonna tell you: Go ahead, take away my liquor license. People are still going to come to the games.”

Dolan stated the ban on alcohol would not impression him, as a result of he is been sober for 29 years. He added that they are going to publish flyers at stations the place beer is often bought that function an image of SLA CEO Sharif Kabir, which is able to embrace his e mail and cellphone quantity.

Dolan stated he would instruct followers to “tell [Kabir] to stick to his knitting and to do what he’s supposed to be doing. And stop grandstanding and trying to get press.”

The SLA commented later Thursday, following Dolan’s remarks.

“All establishments licensed to traffic in alcoholic beverages by the State Liquor Authority are subject to and are expected to comply with the same laws and obligations, whether they are a small business or a multi-billion dollar corporation,” the regulator stated. “After receiving a complaint, the State Liquor Authority followed standard procedure and issued a Letter of Advice explaining this business’ obligation to keep their premises open to the public, as required by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law.”

New invoice launched to cease main venues from utilizing facial recognition expertise to preserve individuals out that work for firms which have lawsuits out in opposition to them. NBC New York’s Sarah Wallace studies.

New York State Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal responded to Dolan’s interview, tweeting “Maybe James Dolan should’ve sold tickets to this public meltdown of a petulant, petty and vindictive billionaire.”

Hoylman-Sigal, who represents a part of Manhattan, launched a press release that additional expanded his ideas on Dolan, calling the interview a “public meltdown” and labeling him the “poster child of privilege, as someone who inherited his wealth and receives an annual $43 million dollar tax break” from the town.

“James Dolan showed why Albany should pass our legislation (S2424) and close the ‘sporting event’ loophole in our Civil Rights Law that allows Dolan to ban fans from Madison Square Garden using facial-recognition technology, simply because they work at law firms with clients he deems opposed to his financial interests,” the assertion learn. “Given Dolan’s condescending perspective in the direction of the remainder of us, it’s not shocking that he’s taken to…publicly humiliating trustworthy and hardworking civil servants just like the CEO of the State Liquor Authority.

“New York shouldn’t allow petty tyrants to impose their warped fantasies on the public while reaping millions each year from taxpayer subsidies. I’m grateful to both the New York State Attorney General and the Manhattan District Attorney for launching inquiries into Dolan’s vindictive business practices intended to silence his critics,” the assertion concluded.

New York legislators are trying to get higher protections for ticketholders and shortly may take intention at the corporate’s use of facial recognition expertise in implementing their coverage — whilst the corporate refuses to again down.

“MSG instituted a straightforward policy that precludes attorneys pursuing active litigation against the company from attending events at our venues until that litigation is resolved,” the corporate beforehand advised NBC New York.

Dolan’s remarks got here after New York Legal professional Normal Letitia James pressed Madison Square Garden Leisure about its reported use of facial recognition expertise to determine opposing legal professionals.

“MSG Entertainment cannot fight their legal battles in their own arenas,” James stated Wednesday in a launch saying her letter. She’s searching for a response from MSG Leisure by Feb. 13.

“Madison Square Garden and Radio City Music Hall are world-renowned venues and should treat all patrons who purchased tickets with fairness and respect,” she stated. “Anyone with a ticket to an event should not be concerned that they may be wrongfully denied entry based on their appearance, and we’re urging MSG Entertainment to reverse this policy.”

Madison Square Garden Leisure responded to the letter later Wednesday.

“To be clear, our policy does not unlawfully prohibit anyone from entering our venues and it is not our intent to dissuade attorneys from representing plaintiffs in litigation against us. We are merely excluding a small percentage of lawyers only during active litigation,” a spokesperson stated in a press release. “Most importantly, to even suggest anyone is being excluded based on the protected classes identified in state and federal civil rights laws is ludicrous. Our policy has never applied to attorneys representing plaintiffs who allege sexual harassment or employment discrimination.”

A spokesperson for the corporate beforehand advised NBC New York that their facial recognition expertise doesn’t retain photographs of people, aside from these beforehand suggested they’re prohibited from getting into the corporate’s venues or whose earlier misconduct has recognized them as being a safety danger.

An lawyer whose agency is in litigation with MSG Leisure was barred from attending a Radio Metropolis Rockettes’ present along with her daughter and different Woman Scouts as a result of the corporate’s facial recognition expertise knew the place she labored. NBC New York’s Sarah Wallace studies.

What began the controversy was a mom becoming a member of her daughter on a Woman Scout journey to Radio Metropolis. Conlon is an affiliate with the New Jersey primarily based regulation agency, Davis, Saperstein and Solomon, which for years has been concerned in private harm litigation in opposition to a restaurant venue now below the umbrella of MSG Leisure.

However Conlon stated she herself does not apply regulation in New York, and isn’t an lawyer engaged on any circumstances involving MSG.

That did not cease MSG Leisure from figuring out and zeroing in on her simply as she acquired into the foyer earlier than the present the weekend after Thanksgiving. Safety guards stepped in, and whereas her daughter, different members of the Woman Scout troop and their moms acquired to go benefit from the present, Conlon wasn’t allowed to achieve this.

“It was pretty simultaneous, I think, to me, going through the metal detector, that I heard over an intercom or loudspeaker,” she advised NBC New York. “I heard them say woman with long dark hair and a grey scarf.”

She stated she was requested her title and to produce identification.

“I believe they said that our recognition picked you up,” Conlon stated.

An indication at Radio Metropolis Music Corridor acknowledged that facial recognition is used as a safety measure to guarantee security for visitors and workers. Conlon says she posed no risk, however the guards nonetheless kicked her out with the reason that they knew she was an lawyer.

“They knew my name before I told them. They knew the firm I was associated with before I told them. And they told me I was not allowed to be there,” stated Conlon.

Critics of the NYPD’s use of facial recognition expertise to determine suspects say the software is inaccurate does not all the time work on individuals with darker pores and skin however the police division argue that the expertise is rarely the only real foundation for an arrest. I-Crew’s Jonathan Dienst studies.

MSG stated she was banned — together with fellow attorneys in that agency and others, as in accordance to their coverage.

“While we understand this policy is disappointing to some, we cannot ignore the fact that litigation creates an inherently adverse environment. All impacted attorneys were notified of the policy, including Davis, Saperstein and Salomon, which was notified twice,” a spokesperson for MSG Leisure stated in a press release.

“This whole scheme is a pretext for doing collective punishment on adversaries who would dare sue MSG in their multi-billion dollar network,” stated Sam Davis, a accomplice at the agency the place Conlon works.

Davis has upped the authorized ante, difficult MSG’s license with the State Liquor Authority.

“The liquor license that MSG got requires them to admit members of the public, unless there are people who would be disruptive who constitute a security threat,” stated Davis. “Taking a mother, separating a mother from her daughter and Girl Scouts she was watching over — and to do it under the pretext of protecting any disclosure of litigation information — is absolutely absurd. The fact they’re using facial recognition to do this is frightening. It’s un-American to do this.”

A spokesperson for MSG reiterated in a press release that security is their highest precedence and that facial recognition is simply one of many strategies they use. MSG Leisure additionally stated it’s assured their coverage is in compliance with all relevant legal guidelines, together with the New York State Liquor Authority.

Source link

Exit mobile version